I present the following minimally-editorialised conversation between me and a dear friend (who wishes to remain anonymous for the purposes of this reproduction) in the hopes that it will be useful but without any warranty; except for the warranty that it is true to my proverbial soul. The only context this requires to avoid unduly scandalising the reader is that he's also gay, so the call is coming from inside the house. Comment and opine under post.
nabijaczleweli:
who knew drawing were so easy if you can just induce a hallucination and trace off that!↬ nabijaczleweli: who knew drawing were so easy if you can just induce a hallucination and trace off that!Mayfly:
us ubermensch can do it on commandnabijaczleweli:
this actually explains why me, aged like 5-8, drew trees as straight lines and my father laughed at me that i couldnt draw them normal and curvynabijaczleweli:
"wow normally people cant draw straight lines but you can only draw straight lines wow funny"nabijaczleweli:
turns out when you have to model the universe based on semantic data alone its almost impossible to draw anything that isn't a schematic!!nabijaczleweli:
before this it was inconceivable that anyone could get visual hallucinations of any kindnabijaczleweli:
recalling a memory is equivalent to getting an ordered list of semantic, semiotic, and spatial relationshipsnabijaczleweli:
i can also tell you that it's impossible to answer the aphantasia test diagram correctlynabijaczleweli:
me with eyeliner [context, ed.]nabijaczleweli:
theres a fundamental conceptual wall when youre reading this that it's 100% not possible to imagine a world where you do actually hallucinate somethingnabijaczleweli:
can you see an apple? sure the apple is red, has a leaf, the underside has a fucked up flower left over if you spin itnabijaczleweli:
being autistic is this bandgap but about everything youve ever experienced in your life btw↬ nabijaczleweli: this is what that meansMayfly:
well the question is morenabijaczleweli:
to you this means hallucinate an apple and look at it, to me this means "i will be talking about apples. when answering questions about the result, remember that it's red and spinning"↬ Mayfly: so if I ask you to imagine a little lizard on your keyboard the question makes no sense?nabijaczleweli:
"a lizard could be on my keyboard i suppose. to what end?"↬ nabijaczleweli: to you this means hallucinate an apple and look at it, to me this means "i will be talking about apples. when answering questions about the result, remember that it's red and spinning"Mayfly:
but then one could ask questions like↬ Mayfly: those are the statements that should tell you something is offnabijaczleweli:
its impossible to conceive of a universe where there is a counterfactual to thisnabijaczleweli:
therefore i can conceive of a universe with a counterfactual because i am living in that universenabijaczleweli:
i have real weed (as opposed to weed goop which is narrow-spectrum) on the way. this may work better or it may work worse
Nit-pick? Correction? Improvement? Annoying? Cute? Anything?
Mail,
post, or open!